< Return to Talk
07.10.08, 05:50 AM General Topics
4 replies
Do I understand this correctly? Investigators found a drop of blood on Jon Benet's underwear at the crime scene, and it didn't match anyone in the family. But for all these years that was not enough to exonerate the family. WTF? How else could they explain the drop of blood on a child's underwear? [ Reply | Watch | Flag ]
General Topics 07.10.08, 05:50 AM Flag
 

Dear UrbanBaby community,

Thank you so much for being a valued member of the UrbanBaby community. We wanted to inform you that we are shutting down the site on July 6th. We are grateful for your participation and support that has helped make UrbanBaby such an important resource to parents for many years.

If you have any questions or concerns, you can email us at urbanbaby-support@cbsinteractive.com.

Thanks so much,

UrbanBaby Support

»
it was a modern-day witch hunt, so sad [ Reply | More
]
General Topics 07.10.08, 05:58 AM Flag
»
I am really shocked that the police and district attorney were able to get away with this. [ Reply | More
]
General Topics 07.10.08, 06:02 AM Flag
»
It's possible that Techniques for testing DNA have improved to the point that that drop of blood is now sufficient whereas a decade ago it was not. [ Reply | More
]
General Topics 07.10.08, 06:04 AM Flag
»
I understand until now that they may not be able to make a conclusive match to anyone else (now they have an exact profile). But the article I read said that by 1998 they had eliminated all family members as possibly matching the blood. [ Reply | More
]
General Topics 07.10.08, 06:06 AM Flag
Refresh » New Post »
Select Category
close [X]

close [X]

Select a Category (only 1)

category
Stages
Regions